Fabian-Miller v. Department of Social & Health Services
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.
¶1 This case requires us to decide whether the interstate compact on placement of children, ch. 26. 34 RCW, applies to parental placements. We hold it does not and affirm the trial court’s decision to place D.F.-M. with his father in Oklahoma.
FACTS
¶2 D.F.-M. was born on July 19, 2005. On December 22, 2005, a Washington court entered an order in a parentage action, finding that Rico Verner is D.’s father and designating his mother, Alyce Fabian-Miller, as his custodian. The order reserved the issue of a parenting plan for future determination upon motion by either party. No parenting plan was…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- IDHW v. John Doe (2022-32)Idaho Supreme Court · 2023
- In Re: R.S.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- In the Interest of C.R.-A.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Riverside County Department of Public Social Services v. B.B.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- In the Interest of S.R.C.-Q.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.