Legal Opinion

In the Interest of C.R.-A.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 24, 2017No. 04-16-00782-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by:

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

After the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (“the Department”) initiated termination proceedings against the parents of C.R.-A.A., but before the final hearing, the associate judge—based on a motion filed by Father—signed an order in which she determined: (1) Oklahoma has exclusive continuing jurisdiction over C.R.-A.A. under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (“UCCJEA”); (2) C.R.A.A. should be placed with Father in Oklahoma pursuant to the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (“ICPC”); and (3) the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. City of Rockwall v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. May v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Tarrant Appraisal District v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. First American Title Insurance Co. v. CombsTexas Supreme Court · 2008

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. IDHW v. John Doe (2022-32)Idaho Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Matter of Emmanuel B. (Lynette J.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  3. Matter of Emmanuel B. (Lynette J.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  4. A. G. v. Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Commonwealth of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Guardian Ad Litem v. Department of Children and FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API