In the Interest of C.R.-A.A.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by:
Marialyn Barnard, Justice
After the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (“the Department”) initiated termination proceedings against the parents of C.R.-A.A., but before the final hearing, the associate judge—based on a motion filed by Father—signed an order in which she determined: (1) Oklahoma has exclusive continuing jurisdiction over C.R.-A.A. under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (“UCCJEA”); (2) C.R.A.A. should be placed with Father in Oklahoma pursuant to the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (“ICPC”); and (3) the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Rockwall v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- May v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Tarrant Appraisal District v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- First American Title Insurance Co. v. CombsTexas Supreme Court · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- IDHW v. John Doe (2022-32)Idaho Supreme Court · 2023
- Matter of Emmanuel B. (Lynette J.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Matter of Emmanuel B. (Lynette J.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- A. G. v. Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Commonwealth of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 2021
- Guardian Ad Litem v. Department of Children and FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.