Legal Opinion

Riverside County Department of Public Social Services v. B.B.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 2010No. E050209PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHLI, J.

“One of the key elements of any interstate compact is uniformity in interpretation. Uniformity, however, is lacking with respect to the issue of whether the [Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children] applies to the placement of a child with a natural parent. . . .” (Butler, Child Welfare—Outside the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children— Placement of a Child with a Natural Parent (1992) 37 Villanova L.Rev. 896, 916, fn. omitted.)

As we will discuss, California cases have consistently held that the Interstate Compact on Placement of Children (ICPC; Fam. Code, §…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. HuffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. DSS v. Clay Co. Dept. of Human Res.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  3. Adoption of WarrenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  4. In Re Alexis O.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  5. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAM. v. BenwayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re: R.S.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. In the Interest of C.R.-A.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Fritz S.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Jamie P.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Graphic Packaging Corporation v. Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas And Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API