Legal Opinion

Bates v. Zehnpfennig

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 17, 1935No. 42915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

Plaintiff-receiver commenced this action to recover the amount of five promissory notes. The notes were not in the possession of the receiver, having been surrendered to defendant and stamped “paid” by the bank more than two years before the appointment of the receiver. Before trial, the case was transferred to equity and is before us as a suit in equity. The defense consisted of a general denial and the affirmative allegation that long prior to the appointment of the receiver the notes had been paid, satisfied, and discharged and duly canceled by the bank and surrendered to the defendant.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. GriffinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Neilly v. HennesseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Rembe v. FergusonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  4. Sheffield Milling Co. v. HeitzmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  2. In Re Estate of CusterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  3. Koch v. GarnierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  4. Keplinger v. BarerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API