Legal Opinion

In re Green

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 31, 1938No. 3906PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting all of the claims — 3 to 8, inclusive — in appellant’s application for a patent for an alleged invention in improvements in a “Magnetic Impulse Contactor.”

Claims 3 and 5 are illustrative of the appealed claims. They read:

3. A magnetic impulse registering device adapted for registering electric impulses caused by certain passing objects and operative therewith, comprising a magnet of the permanent type surrounded by continuous coil winding of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. BoisselierSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re WiedmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  2. Matter of the Application of Edward A. Patton and Forrest F. BeilCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  3. Application of Birdsall P. Lawson, Deceased (Pilling Chain Co., Assignee)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  4. Application of Daniel Morton RoseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  5. Application of George P. WiedmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API