Matter of the Application of Edward A. Patton and Forrest F. Beil
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Acting Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the holding of the Primary Examiner rejecting as unpatentable claims 34, 35, 36, and 37, the only remaining claims in appellants’ application for a patent entitled “Cellu-losic Board and Method of Treating the Same.”
The alleged invention, as disclosed in the specification and defined in the claims, relates to a method of ornamenting construction board which is made from sawdust bound together with a thermoset-ting resinous binder. This type of board, before…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Locomotive Engine Safety Truck Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Ansonia Brass & Copper Co. v. Electrical Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Application of LindbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- In Re SwitzerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Georgia-Pacific Plywood Co. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Oxford Filing Supply Co. v. Globe-Wernicke Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957