Legal Opinion
Markham v. Taylor
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 21, 1947PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, District Judge.
These are motions (1) by the plaintiff, and (2) by the defendant Propper as Receiver of an Austrian cooperative society known as AKM, for judgment on the pleadings, or in the alternative for summary judgment, with respect to Count No. 2 of the complaint.
The action is brought by the plaintiff, Alien Property Custodian, to recover different sums alleged to be owing by the defendant, American Society of Composers, Authors & Publishers (hereinafter referred to as ASCAP), to three European performing rights societies, respectively. The complaint contains three separate counts,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Markham v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Decker v. . GardnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Keeney v. . Home Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Commission for Polish Relief, Ltd. v. Banca Nationala a RumanieiNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Herring v. . N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Propper v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Clark v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Bernstein v. N. v. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-MaatschappijDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Clark v. PropperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-MaatschappijDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.