Legal Opinion

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports

Decided February 22, 2010Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Steven R. Brunk

State Representative, 85th District

State Capitol, Room 143-N

Topeka, Kansas 66612

Dear Representative Brunk:

You inquire whether K.S.A. 40-2248 violates Article 2, § 1 of the Kansas Constitution because it purportedly limits the ability of future legislatures to mandate health insurance coverage for certain health services unless a report assessing the impact of such a mandate (impact report) is provided. If constitutional, you then inquire whether K.S.A. 40-2248 prohibits the legislature from considering mandatory health insurance coverage legislation in the absence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. RaschkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc. v. PraegerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. In Re Tax Application of Lietz Constr. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. Sedlak v. DickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. City of Kansas City v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API