Attorney General Opinion No.
Kansas Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
The Honorable Steven R. Brunk
State Representative, 85th District
State Capitol, Room 143-N
Topeka, Kansas 66612
Dear Representative Brunk:
You inquire whether K.S.A. 40-2248 violates Article 2, § 1 of the Kansas Constitution because it purportedly limits the ability of future legislatures to mandate health insurance coverage for certain health services unless a report assessing the impact of such a mandate (impact report) is provided. If constitutional, you then inquire whether K.S.A. 40-2248 prohibits the legislature from considering mandatory health insurance coverage legislation in the absence…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. RaschkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc. v. PraegerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- In Re Tax Application of Lietz Constr. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- Sedlak v. DickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- City of Kansas City v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.