Legal Opinion

National Surety Co. v. Perth Amboy Trust Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 21, 1935No. 5481PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

Peterson, an agent of the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, swindled that company out of a large sum of money of which only a part is here involved. So far as this case is concerned, he did it in this way: Representing the Insurance Company in soliciting life insurance and delivering checks in paying insurance claims and having access to its papers- and forms,, Peterson fabricated applications and obtained policies upon the lives of thirteen fictitious persons and upon the lives of four real persons who knew nothing about it. He paid the premiums. Then, from time to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Robb v. VosSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Fowler v. . Bowery Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. MaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. Fourth Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. American Surety Co. of New York v. Bank of CaliforniaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1941
  3. Willcox v. GoessCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  4. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Cincinnati BranchDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1939
  5. Safety Motors, Inc. v. Elk Horn Bank & Trust Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API