Legal Opinion

Royal Indemnity Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Cincinnati Branch

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 29, 1939No. 4973PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRUFFEL, District Judge.

The above-entitled action was submitted to the court for decision upon the pleadings and stipulations as to relevant and material evidence, from which it appears:

That during the period July 28, 1931, to August 16, 1933, Ralph A. Cable, Longmont, Colorado, was employed by the Union Central Life Insurance Company of Cincinnati, as agent; that as such agent he was authorized to solicit and submit applications for life insurance and to render service to all policyholders in his territory incident to their policies, including the delivery to such policyholders of all checks…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. United States v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. United States v. National Exchange BankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1891
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. Fourth Nat. Bank of AtlantaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. BurdetteDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1988
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Security Truck LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Community Fed. Sav. & Loan v. Transamerica Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1983
  4. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  5. United States v. Citizens Union Nat. BankDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API