Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Mulford v. Mayhew

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1864PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from tho District Court, Third Judicial District, Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Rhodes, J.

A judgment of foreclosure was rendered in favor of Wm. N. Spear against John B. Ward and others, on the 6th of August, 1861; and in 1862 an order of sale was issued upon the judgment, and the defendant as the Sheriff of Alameda County, sold the mortgaged premises to the relator, Wicks and Smith jointly, as appears by his return, though the relator contends that he was the sole purchaser. The sale was made on the 22d day of December, 1862, for fourteen thousand dollars, which sum was paid by the relator in United States treasury notes. On the 28th day of April, 1863,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. President of the Bank of the United States v. President of the Bank of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Dickenson v. GillilandNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  3. Vaughn v. ElyNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Lick v. FaulknerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Ex parte BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1825

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Belloc v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Boyd v. OlveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Wood v. ConradSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Foster v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Swain v. Stockton Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API