Wood v. Conrad
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from circuit court, Pennington county. Hon. Chas. M. Thomas, Judge. From the judgment rendered in this case both parties appealed. In an opinion infra — 2 S. D. 334, this court decided the questions of error assigned by the plaintiff. This decision is founded upon those assigned by the defendant. But one set of briefs were filed by counsel, which have been noticed in connection with the former opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
' Bennett, J.
The facts and controversy of this case are fully stated in the case of Wood v. Conrad, decided at this term of court, and reported in 50 N. W. Rep. 95. On the trial in the court below, neither the plaintiff nor the defendant was satisfied with the judgment of the court, and each appeals, making separate and different assignments of errors. The decision in the above case was based upon the errors assigned by the plaintiff; this one will be founded upon the alleged errors occurring at the trial, affecting defendant’s rights.
The abstract shows that the referee, against the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ladd v. BluntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
- United States v. DashielSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Mulford v. EstudilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Denton v. LivingstonNew York Supreme Court · 1812
- Curtis v. RootIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re NelsonDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1935
- MacGregor v. PierceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Arnoldy v. Mahoney & FinnemanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Roberts v. ParkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
- Harding v. HardingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.