Legal Opinion

Murray v. 3M Co.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided March 13, 2018No. 5:15–CV–00101–JMPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

James M. Moody Jr., United States District Judge

This is a products liability action in which Plaintiff, Larry Murray, alleges that a 3M mask failed to adequately protect him from silica exposure. Pending are the following motions filed by the remaining defendant, 3M Company ("3M"): a motion for summary judgment (Document No. 57), three motions to exclude testimony (Documents. 60-62), and a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and judicial estoppel due to Plaintiff's bankruptcy filing (Document No. 80). All of the motions have been responded to and are ripe for determination.

Background…

2Cases cited11 opinions

Segal v. RochelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
Samuel Stallings v. Hussmann Corporation Brian GroningerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
Martin v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
Dante Combs v. The Cordish Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
In Re Prempro Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Ahlgren, Trustee v. Scott Morrison in his capacity as Trustee of the MUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 2019