Blaine v. Darwin
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
In this action, the appellant, E. F. Blaine, sought to recover against the respondents, L. H. Darwin and Katherine Darwin, his wife, upon a promissory note. There was a trial by jury and a verdict returned in favor of the defendants, on which a judgment of dismissal with prejudice was entered.
The complaint was in form that usual in such cases. It was alleged therein that on July 5, 1918, one Arthur V. Watts, for a valuable consideration, executed and delivered his promissory note to the respondent L. H. Darwin for the sum of two hundred dollars, payable on demand, and that Darwin, for a like…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anaheim Water Co. v. Semi-Tropic Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1883
- Pitcher v. Lone Pine-Surprise Consolidated Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Johnston v. McCartWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Tucker v. TuckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Schultz v. NobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McGregor v. First Farmers-Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
- Nelson Equipment Co. v. GoodmanWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Wilkinson v. FeildDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1952
- Hunter-Wilson Distilling Co. v. Foust Distilling Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Davies v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.