Legal Opinion

Condon-Johnson & Associates, Inc. v. Sacramento Municipal Utility District

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 2007No. C050715PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, Acting P. J.

Public Contract Code section 7104 1 requires that a local public entity that has contracted for public work involving an excavation deeper than four feet issue a change order altering the contractor’s cost of performing the work when the subsurface conditions at the jobsite materially differ from those “indicated” in the contract. (§ 7104, subds. (a)(2) & (b).)

Plaintiff Condon-Johnson & Associates, Inc.. (Condon-Johnson), was the low bidder on a contract with defendant Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) to construct 13 concrete foundations for piers to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Edwards v. Centex Real Estate Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Atlantic National Insurance v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. EH Morrill Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Children's Hospital Central California v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Ceja v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Appel v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Winslett v. 1811 27th Ave., LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Kim v. Toyota Motor Corp., California Court of Appeal, 2nd District2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API