Legal Opinion
Rose v. United States
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 14, 1957No. C. A. No. 13875PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McILVAINE, District Judge.
The Court finds the facts as stipulated by and between the respective parties to this action as follows:
Findings of Fact
1. Plaintiff at all of the times hereinafter mentioned was, and now is, the duly appointed, qualified and acting executrix of the estate of John W. Hubbard, Deceased (hereinafter referred to as the estate) and a resident of the City of Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, in this District.
2. The plaintiff brings this action against the United States of America to recover income taxes and interest thereon which the plaintiff claims were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dixie Pine Products Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Rosenman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Lewyt Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Chestnut Securities Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
- Hodgkins v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Arheit v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
- Shubert v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
- Wurst v. Nestle Foods Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Arheit v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.