Legal Opinion
Wurst v. Nestle Foods Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 7, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-1083PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
COHILL, Chief Judge.
This action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Gary L. Lancaster in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 3 and 4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. On November 22,1991, the Magistrate Judge filed his Report, which concluded that defendant’s motion for summary judgment should be granted. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Report. After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and objections thereto, the following ORDER is entered this day of 7th…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Clay v. Advanced Computer Applications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Banks Engineering Co. v. PolonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Shick v. Shirey, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clarion County1995
- Wurst (David P.) v. Nestle Foods CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992