Legal Opinion

Shopland v. County of Onondaga

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 6, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified on the law without costs and as modified affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: Special Term erred in denying defendant Walker’s motion for summary judgment on the malicious *942prosecution cause of action. It is well established that an indictment by a Grand Jury creates a presumption of probable cause (Colon v City of New York, 60 NY2d 78, 82; Lee v City of Mount Vernon, 49 NY2d 1041; Landsman v Moss, 133 AD2d 359, 360; Malte v State of New York, 125 AD2d 958, 960, Iv denied 69 NY2d 607; Boose v City of Rochester, 71 AD2d 59, 69). The presumption of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Colon v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Boose v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Lee v. City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Malte v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Landsman v. MossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. ZETES, JAMES P. v. STEPHENS, KELLY A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Shales v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API