Shopland v. County of Onondaga
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law without costs and as modified affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: Special Term erred in denying defendant Walker’s motion for summary judgment on the malicious *942prosecution cause of action. It is well established that an indictment by a Grand Jury creates a presumption of probable cause (Colon v City of New York, 60 NY2d 78, 82; Lee v City of Mount Vernon, 49 NY2d 1041; Landsman v Moss, 133 AD2d 359, 360; Malte v State of New York, 125 AD2d 958, 960, Iv denied 69 NY2d 607; Boose v City of Rochester, 71 AD2d 59, 69). The presumption of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Colon v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Boose v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Lee v. City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Malte v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Landsman v. MossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ZETES, JAMES P. v. STEPHENS, KELLY A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Shales v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1991