Lee v. City of Mount Vernon
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The victim’s identification of plaintiff as the robber and the Grand Jury’s indictment established probable cause for his prosecution. In the face of those two elements plaintiff must establish that the identification was the result of a conspiracy between the officials and the victim and that the indictment was the result of fraud, perjury or the suppression of evidence (see Anns., 28 ALR3d 748, 66 ALR3d 10).
The evidence presented did not make out prima facie such a *1043case. Not to be lost sight…
2Cited by39 opinions
- Colon v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Maria De Lourdes Torres v. Police Officer JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- Gisondi v. Town of HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Whitmore v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Medina v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.