Legal Opinion
Jacobs v. Rittenbaum
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided April 15, 1942No. 14014, 14015PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Justice.
1. “No petition need be verified unless it seeks extraordinary equitable relief or remedy.” Code, § 81-109. “Petitions for a restraining order, injunction, receiver, or other extraordinary relief shall be verified positively by the petitioner or supported by other satisfactory proofs.” § 81-110. These provisions as to verification and “proofs” relate to preliminaries, such as sanction, filing, and interlocutory hearing, and do not require that an amendment offered on final trial shall be verified. See Code, §§ 81-111, 81-112; Lee v. Clark, 49 Ga. 82; Alspaugh v. Adams, 80 Ga.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Mashburn & Co. v. Dannenberg Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- First National Bank v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- National Bank v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- McCalla v. ShawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Hadaway v. HadawaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jones v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Carpenter v. ForsheeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Irwin v. ArrendaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Old Colony Insurance v. DresselCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Whitner v. WhitnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.