Legal Opinion
People v. Lieberman
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 26, 1979PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The points which appellant’s present counsel seeks to argue were not preserved for review by his trial attorney. With respect to the claim that the Special Prosecutor acted in excess of his authority, defendant’s omnibus motion made no reference to the point and nothing appears in the moving papers except a passing reference in the reply affidavit. With respect to the speedy trial issue now argued on constitutional grounds, it was not referred to in the notice of motion which mentioned only CPL 30.30.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. TuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. UdzinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- James Barber v. Charles Scully, Superintendent, Greenhaven Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- People v. WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. BiggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.