Application of Simon L. Ruskin
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
Simon L. Ruskin appeals from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 13-17 of appellant’s application1 for “Fossil Fuels.” No claims have been allowed. The sole rejection is lack of utility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 because of inoperativeness.
The subject matter here claimed is a method for increasing the energy release of fossil fuels such as coal and petroleum upon combustion.
Claim 13, which is sufficient for purposes of this opinion, reads as follows:
The process of treating a fossil fuel to increase its energy release on subsequent combustion…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Application of John A. Nelson and Anthony C. ShabicaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
3Cited by8 opinions
- Envirotech Corporation v. Al George, Incorporated and Monosep, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Ritter v. Rohm & Haas CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Application of Jacques Georges PottierCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of Jean Maurice GazaveCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USADistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.