Legal Opinion

Al Maha Trading & Contracting Holding Co. v. W.S. Darley & Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 27, 2013No. 12 C 1920PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART W.S. DARLEY & CO. ’S RULE 12(B)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS [15]

JAMES F. HOLDERMAN, Chief Judge.

On March 16, 2012, plaintiff Al Maha Trading & Contracting Holding Company (“Al Maha”) filed a twelve-count complaint against defendant W.S. Darley & Co. (“Darley”), seeking damages and equitable remedies resulting from “Darley’s selection and sale of six fire trucks to Al Maha.” (Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”) ¶ 1.)

Pending before the court is Darley’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 15.) For the reasons set forth below, Darley’s motion…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Swanson v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sadler v. Pella Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
  2. Maxtech Consumer Products, Ltd. v. Robert Bosch Tool Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. Princeton Industrial, Products, Inc. v. Precision Metals Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  4. Bakopoulos v. Mars Petcare US, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  5. Brechbill v. Home Invest LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API