State v. Truesdale
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Appellants were tried in district court on the warrants, were found guilty and appealed to the superior court. From the record it appears that the State inadvertently sent bills of indictment to the grand jury but announced in open court “that the State does not propose to proceed under the bill of indictment, but rather under the warrant on which the defendant was tried in the District Court of this county ...” Appellants assign as error the denial of a motion to quash the bills of indictment, alleging that their mere existence puts them in jeopardy twice for the same offense.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. BirckheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State v. FennerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- State v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MedlinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987