Noonan v. East-West Beltline, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Lionel W. Noonan appeals from the summary judgment granted in favor of East-West Beltline, Inc., which holds that East-West Beltline, Inc., (hereinafter "East-West") is entitled to a $24,184.21 refund of recording taxes.
The uncontested facts are as follows:
East-West was the owner of all of the outstanding capital stock of the Bel Air Corporation.1 On March 15, 1984, Bel Air entered into two separate financing transactions with AmSouth Bank, N.A. ("AmSouth"). The first financing transaction ("revolver loan") entered into on this date was an amendment to an existing revolving credit agreement…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alabama Industrial Bank v. State Ex Rel. C. E. AvingerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Cherokee County v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Tate v. TeagueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Phenix City v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1948
3Cited by16 opinions
- Vaughn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte Emerald Mountain Expressway BridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- T.G. v. Houston County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- City of Pinson v. Utilities Bd. of City of OneontaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Hiler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.