Legal Opinion

City of Pinson v. Utilities Bd. of City of Oneonta

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 20, 2007No. 1060369PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The City of Pinson, the Town of Cleveland, and the Town of Highland Lake (collectively "the Municipalities") appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the Utilities Board of the City of Oneonta ("the Utilities Board") in the Utilities Board's action seeking a judgment declaring it exempt from a tax imposed by the Municipalities. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

Facts and Procedural History

The Utilities Board supplies natural gas to customers in the City of Pinson and the Town of Cleveland and water service to customers in the Town of Highland Lake. Each one of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Bean Dredging v. Alabama Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Continental Nat. Indem. Co. v. FieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. Scott Bridge Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  5. AMER. GEN. LIFE AND ACC. INS. v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hiler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  2. Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Bishop State Community College v. ArchibleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  4. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  5. Ed Davis v. City of MontevalloSupreme Court of Alabama · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API