Legal Opinion

Shell Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, the Rodman Corporation v. Federal Power Commission

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 20, 1975No. 74--4036PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Circuit Judge:

Despite the energy crisis and the fact that the orders forming the subject matter of the instant petitions for review are said to grant the largest rate increase in the history of regulatory agencies, the review process is at a standstill pending decision on jurisdiction as between this court and the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. As will be seen, the problem stems, in the main, from the option given by statute, § 19(b) of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S. C.A. § 717r, to one aggrieved by an order of the Federal Power Commission, to obtain review of such order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Hoiness v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Jacob Blitzstein v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  4. Saturn Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, and Consolidated Cases. In Re National Rate Cases for New GasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  3. Southland Mower Co. v. United States Consumer Product Safety CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  5. Southland Mower Company v. United States Consumer Product Safety CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API