Legal Opinion

Southland Mower Company v. United States Consumer Product Safety Commission

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 18, 1979No. 79-1203Published

1Opinion of the Court

600 F.2d 12

SOUTHLAND MOWER COMPANY, Yazoo Manufacturing Company, Inc.,

and Outdoor Power Equipment Institute, Inc., Petitioners,

v.

UNITED STATES CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION, Respondent.

Nos. 79-1203, 79-1295 and 79-1469.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

July 18, 1979.

Dunaway, McCarthy & Dye, Mac S. Dunaway, George D. Billock, Jr., Washington, D.C., Baldwin & Haspel, New Orleans, La., for petitioners.

John O. Hayward, Lexington, Mass., pro se, amicus curiae.

John S. Byington, Commissioner, Andrew S. Krulwich, Gen. Counsel, Consumer Product Safety Com'n, Robert B. Nicholson, Peter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Industrial Union Department v. BinghamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  3. United Steelworkers of America v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. Southland Mower Co. v. United States Consumer Product Safety CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. Shell Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, the Rodman Corporation v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API