Legal Opinion
Southland Mower Co. v. United States Consumer Product Safety Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 18, 1979No. Nos. 79-1203, 79-1295 and 79-1469PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:
On January 25,1979, the Consumer Product Safety Commission met to consider issuing consumer product safety standards for walk-behind power lawn mowers under 15 U.S.C. §§ 2057, 2058. Although the Commission voted its approval of the standards, it decided that the final, redrafted document would be signed at a subsequent meeting and that the standards would be promulgated ten days after their publication in the Federal Register. Immediately after the Commission acted, Southland Mower Co. et al. filed a petition for review of the standards in the Court of Appeals for the Fifth…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Industrial Union Department, Afl-Cio v. Dr. Eula Bingham, Assistant Secretary of Labor, the American Petroleum Institute, the National Petroleum Refiners Association on Behalf of Their Respective Members and American Petrofina, Incorporated v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, United States Department of Labor, Dr. Eula Bingham, Assistant Secretary of Labor, and Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, Manufacturing Chemists Association, American Iron and Steel Institute, Independent Petroleum Association of America, Industrial Union Dept., Afl-Cio and United Rubber Workers, Afl-Cio, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Industrial Union Department v. BinghamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- United Steelworkers of America v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Shell Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, the Rodman Corporation v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
3Cited by8 opinions
- Public Citizen v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America, Nuclear Utility Management and Resources Council, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Mead Corp. v. Stuart Hall Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
- Formaldehyde Institute, Inc. v. United States Consumer Product Safety CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Public Service Company of New Mexico v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, City of Gallup, New Mexico, Intervenor. City of Gallup v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service Company of New Mexico, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- The Formaldehyde Institute, Inc., for and on Behalf of Its Members Virgil E. Stewart Jr. And William E. Nash v. United States Consumer Product Safety Commission, C. P. Chemical Company, Inc. v. Consumer Product Safety CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.