Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Johnson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1930No. 4931Published

1DissentFolland, J.

I dissent. As I view the evidence, no error was committed by the trial court in submitting to the jury the question of whether defendant was under the influence of intoxicating liquor at the time of the accident. The deceased was fatally injured by having been run into and knocked down by an automobile at about 7:15 in the evening. The chief of police saw the defendant at his home at about Í0 o’clock or a little later the same night. The chief testified that at this time he detected a strong odor of liquor on the breath of defendant. It is said in the prevailing opinion that this is all the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. PfefferleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. Commonwealth v. RaccoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Kurtz v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  4. People v. DingleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API