Legal Opinion

Eisenhuth v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 18, 2004No. 03-855 CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HEWITT, Judge.

This is a military pay action. Before the court is Defendant’s Motion for Judgment Upon the Administrative Record (Def.’s Mot.) and Plaintiffs Response to Defendant’s Motion for Judgment Upon the Administrative Record and Cross-Motion for Judgment Upon the Administrative Record (Pl.’s Resp.). For the following reasons, defendant’s motion is GRANTED, and plaintiffs motion is DENIED.

I. Background

Plaintiff Edward N. Eisenhuth was involuntarily discharged from active duty in the United States Navy on July 6, 2001. Complaint (Compl.) 115. In this action, he…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Colonel David W. Palmer, II v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. James L. Murphy v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. Collins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Jefferson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API