Legal Opinion
Daryl v. Boyd
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 28, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-5691PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are Daryl Cook, an inmate at a state correctional institution, and his wife Juanita Cook, who is not incarcerated. The plaintiffs have filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that defendant James Boyd, a counselor at Graterford prison where plaintiff Daryl Cook (“Cook”) was formerly housed, subjected Cook to cruel and inhuman punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment, denied him his right to protect his family interests and his right to access to the courts without due process, and violated his right to equal protection…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Caldwell v. Luzerne County Corrections Facility Management EmployeesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Division of Youth and Family Services v. MYJPNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Goldhaber v. HigginsDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- In re Randy A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Taylor v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.