Legal Opinion

E.P. v. A.M.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 2006No. WD 65656PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.

E.P., the biological mother of Baby Girl P., appeals the circuit court’s judgment denying her motion for leave to withdraw her consent to the adoption of Baby Girl P. E.P. argues on appeal that the substantial weight of the evidence showed (1) E.P. orally withdrew her consent before the circuit judge signed the order approving E.P.’s consent to adoption of Baby Girl P.; (2) E.P. should be allowed to withdraw consent because she was subject to a force of circumstances at the time she gave consent; and (3) E.P., in consenting to the adoption, reasonably relied on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Herbert v. HarlSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  3. Oldaker v. PetersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Epperson v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Sanderson v. Porta-Fab Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Baby Girl P.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Phillip Doyle Chaney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API