Legal Opinion

Herbert v. Harl

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 13, 1988No. 69894PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLIVER, Judge.

Respondents, sellers, sued appellants, buyers, for the amount due on a purchase of a used automobile. Appellants Jerry D. Harl and step-son Steve Williamson had attempted to rescind the purchase. In a bench trial the court found for respondents, David Herbert and his father Ray Herbert on their petition to recover the purchase price. The Court of Appeals, Western District, held that the individual sale of a used automobile is controlled by the Uniform Commercial Code 1 (UCC) and reversed the trial court. We transferred the case to examine the question of whether the UCC…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Trenton Trust Co. v. Western Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. Kelso v. KelsoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  4. Park County Implement Co. v. CraigWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  5. All-States Leasing Company v. BassIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of Crow and GilmoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Jones v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. State Ex Rel. Webster v. Missouri Resource Recovery, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Robin Farms, Inc. v. BartholomeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Jerry Bennett Masonry, Inc. v. Crossland Const. Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API