Legal Opinion

Graziano v. Davis

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1976No. 76 CA 15PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonoekio, J.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, Mahoning County, Ohio.

The facts of this case begin with an action being brought under E. C. 3109.11 by plaintiffs; appellees herein, Mr. and Mrs. Frank Graziano, for visiting rights with Frank Joseph Davis, now five years of age, and Michael James Davis, now four years of age. A hearing was held before the referee of Juvenile Court who made findings of fact and recommendations which were adopted by the trial court. Among the findings of fact adopted by the trial court was that the subject children are the natural children of Frank…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mimkon v. FordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  2. Browning v. TarwaterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Deweese v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Cranston v. ZookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Roquemore v. RoquemoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In re Adoption of RidenourOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hede v. GilstrapWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Matter of Adoption of GardinerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. Ex Parte BronsteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Petition of NearhoofWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API