Legal Opinion

Colby v. . Equitable Trust Company of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1908PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 17, 1908, which reversed an order of Special Term granting a motion for an injunction pendente lite restraining the defendants from consummating a proposed merger of the defendant corporations.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 17, 1908, which reversed an order of Special Term granting a motion for an injunction pendente lite restraining the defendants from consummating a proposed merger of the defendant corporations. The following questions were cértified: “ 1. Are sections 36 to 38 (chapter 689 of the Laws of 1892, and chapter 382 of the Laws of 1895, as amended) of the Banking Law of the State of New York applicable to the defendants the Equitable Trust Company and the Mercantile…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; first question answered in the affirmative; second in the negative; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lord v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Beloff v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Anderson v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Bingham v. Savings Invest., C., E. OrangeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  5. Cleary v. HigleyNew York Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API