In Re McLarty
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Banke, Judge.
Appellants McLarty and Raffauf appeal an order declaring them in contempt of court for "willfully, knowingly making false allegations and filing them of record” in a motion for recusal. The motion sought the trial court’s disqualification from further participation in an equitable proceeding to enjoin a garnishment. It contained allegations that the judge had prejudiced himself against the appellants’ client by entering into ex parte communications with opposing counsel and also that he had a bias against women attorneys which had prejudiced him against a woman attorney who had…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Holt v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re JeffersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- In Re AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- In Re GlennCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Garland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984