Legal Opinion

Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Estate of Ferrel

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 4, 1999No. 98-1263PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lavenski R. Smith, Justice.

This case involves an issue of first impression: Whether first impression: Whether the Arkansas Department of Human Services is subject to traditional common-law principles of subrogation when it seeks reimbursement for medical benefits under Ark. Code Ann. §§ 20-77-301-313 (Repl. 1991 and Supp. 1997) and 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)25. The Arkansas Department of Human Services (“ADHS”) appeals to this court a decision of the Pope County Probate Court holding that it is indeed subject to general equitable principles applied in subrogation cases, in particular, the “made…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Franklin v. Healthsource of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Kittle v. IcardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Daves v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Norwest Bank North Dakota, N.A. v. DothDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
  5. Sullivan v. County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. AhlbornSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Grey Bear v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State Department of Health & Welfare v. HudelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. JaynesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Arkansas Comprehensive Health Insurance Pool v. DentonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API