Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Healthsource of Arkansas

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 21, 1997No. 96-116PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W.H.“Dub” Arnold, Chief Justice.

This case involves a dispute between an insured, Curtis Lee Franklin, and his insurer, Healthsource of Arkansas, over allocation of the proceeds of a policy limit settlement in a personal-injury action; both parties claim exclusive right to the proceeds. The trial court ruled that as a matter of law pursuant to Higginbotham v. Ark. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 312 Ark. 199, 849 S.W.2d 464 (1993), Healthsource was entitled to receive the proceeds because its conventional right of subrogation, which arose from a subrogation agreement, took priority over Franklin’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Garrity v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Shelter Mutual Insurance v. BoughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Shipley v. Northwestern Mutual Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Higginbotham v. Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue ShieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. AhlbornSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. State v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  3. Hare v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Pearson v. HenricksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Shelter Mutual Insurance v. KennedySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API