Legal Opinion
Roybal v. University Ford
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 7, 1989No. D007218PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
Plaintiffs Manuel, Gloria, Adam, and Victoria Roybal (Roybal) appeal summary judgment favoring defendant University Ford on Roybal’s complaint for breach of implied warranty, restitution and rescission, breach of contract, damages, fraud and negligence. Roybal contends the superior court erred in finding res judicata barred the action. We affirm.
I
On October 10, 1985, Manuel and Gloria filed a complaint against University Ford in San Diego County Municipal Court case No. 384743 for breach of implied warranty, restitution and rescission, breach of contract, intentional…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gagnon Co., Inc. v. Nevada Desert InnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Kahn v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Hawber v. RaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Wilson v. BittickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- California State Automobile Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Boeken v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2010
- Holmes v. California National GuardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Rice v. CrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Torrey Pines Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Walsh v. West Valley Mission Cmty. Coll. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.