Legal Opinion

Parker v. Hull

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1888PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Saule County. Action to recover the balance due upon a promissory note. The facts will sufficiently appear from the opinion. The plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

'OjrtoN, J.

This action is brought to recover the sum of $283, the balance due upon a certain $800 note given by the respondent to the appellant in part for the purchase of one third interest in a grist or roller mill in the city of Baraboo. The defendant claims that there was a mistake made at the time, in calculating the amount that should be put into said note, by not deducting from said amount of $800 the sum of $283 for certain profits that the mill had made, which at that time were net estimated or ascertained but were contemplated by the agreement of the parties. The jury found that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ely v. . EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  2. Stockbridge Iron Co. v. Hudson Iron Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Groff v. RohrerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  4. Klauber v. WrightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Bond v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Bowe v. GageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Estate of Hatten v. MonstedWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Grant Marble Co. v. AbbotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API