State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Martin Marietta Corp.

MURPHY, Judge.

In this “coverage question” appeal from the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, the parties have presented three questions for our review. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”), appellant, asks:

I. Was the evidence presented sufficient to allow the jury to decide the issue of permissive use?

II. Did the trial court improperly overturn the verdict of the jury when it granted defendant/appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict?

Martin Marietta Corporation (“Martin”) and Franklin P. Racey (“Racey”), appellees, ask:

*3Did the trial court properly…