Toscano v. Spriggs
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
We issued certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals, after its unreported decision in this motor vehicle tort action, to review that court’s application of the presumption that the operator of a motor vehicle is the agent, servant or employee of its owner and is acting within the scope of such employment. In holding that the presumption had not been rebutted, the intermediate appellate court relied heavily on the presumption of permissive use, articulated in State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Martin Marietta Corp., 105 Md.App. 1, 657 A.2d 1183, cert. granted, 340 Md. 268, 666…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Schneider v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
- State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. HugeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- Vonderhorst Brewing Co. v. AmrhineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
- Brown v. Bendix Radio Division of Bendix Aviation Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Grier v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Edwards v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Bowser v. ReshCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Maya v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1996