Jacobs v. Lakewood Aircraft Service, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LORD, Chief Judge.
I. Preliminary Statement
In this products liability case, defendant Flight Extenders, Inc., a California corporation (“the California Corporation”), seeks summary judgment. Its motion implicates two developing theories: the liability of a successor corporation for torts committed by its predecessor corporation, see Woody v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., 463 F.Supp. 817, 820 (E.D.Tenn.1978); and the liability of a successor corporation for breach of its duty to warn of recently discovered defects in its predecessor’s products, see Wilson v. Fare Well Corp., 140…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Raymond Leannais and Catherine Leannais v. Cincinnati, Incorporated and Cincinnati-Forte Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Charles Travis and Jean Travis v. Harris Corp., Harris-Intertype Corporation, Sheridan Division and Bruno MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Meisel v. M & N Modern Hydraulic Press Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
- Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Stratton v. Garvey International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
- Diaz v. South Bend Lathe Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Amader v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.