Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Lakewood Aircraft Service, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 1981No. Civ. A. 79-1044, 80-0158PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LORD, Chief Judge.

I. Preliminary Statement

In this products liability case, defendant Flight Extenders, Inc., a California corporation (“the California Corporation”), seeks summary judgment. Its motion implicates two developing theories: the liability of a successor corporation for torts committed by its predecessor corporation, see Woody v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., 463 F.Supp. 817, 820 (E.D.Tenn.1978); and the liability of a successor corporation for breach of its duty to warn of recently discovered defects in its predecessor’s products, see Wilson v. Fare Well Corp., 140…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Raymond Leannais and Catherine Leannais v. Cincinnati, Incorporated and Cincinnati-Forte Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  5. Charles Travis and Jean Travis v. Harris Corp., Harris-Intertype Corporation, Sheridan Division and Bruno MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Meisel v. M & N Modern Hydraulic Press Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Stratton v. Garvey International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
  4. Diaz v. South Bend Lathe Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
  5. Amader v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API