Legal Opinion

Meisel v. M & N Modern Hydraulic Press Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1982No. 47936-4PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

Appellant Meisel makes a products liability claim presenting questions of corporation successor liability and corporate disregard. We reject both of her theories of liability as applied to this case and affirm the trial court's order of summary judgment.

M & N Modern Hydraulic Press Company (M & N) was incorporated in 1955 by Nicholas Brodsky, Sr., who was its president until his death in 1974. He also personally owned the land, buildings and equipment which were leased to M & N for its manufacturing activities.

When Nicholas Brodsky, Sr., died in 1974, his son, Nicholas, Jr., inherited the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Price v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Seattle-First National Bank v. TabertWashington Supreme Court · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Martin v. Abbott LaboratoriesWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 12,752 Melvin Williams v. Bowman Livestock Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Hall v. Armstrong Cork, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. George v. Parke-DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Washington Water Jet Workers Ass'n v. YarbroughWashington Supreme Court · 2004

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API