Legal Opinion
Hudiburgh v. Palvic
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 16, 1954No. 4935PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Justice.
The appellee, Tony Pavlic, sued the appellants, Rowena Lindsey Hudiburgh and Harvey Adams, to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by him as a result of an automobile collision on April 6, 1951, between his automobile, which he was driving, and an automobile owned by Mrs. Hudiburgh but driven by Adams. Mrs. Hudiburgh was sued upon the theory that when the collision occurred Adams was acting within the course and scope of his employment as her employee. Upon a jury’s special-issue verdict, supplemented by the court’s finding as to the amount of property damage…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Simmonds v. St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
- Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. MueggeTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Lockley v. PageTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. RobertsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Robertson Tank Lines, Inc. v. Van CleaveTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Albert B. Brooke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- United States v. St. ClairDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Gant v. Dumas Glass and Mirror, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1997
- Hunsucker v. Omega Industries, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.