Legal Opinion

Smith v. Sprague

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Oakland; Smith, J. Trover by William T. Smith against Caleb J. Sprague. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by ' the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This is-a suit in trover for the conversion of a quantity of wheat. Plaintiff’s contention is that in the winter of 1894-95 defendant, Sprague, orally leased his farm for one year to one Orrin Cook, for money rent. The lease commenced with Cook’s occupaney, about March 1, 1895. At that time there was growing on the farm a field of wheat of about 18 acres, and in the lease it was agreed that Cook should have the privilege of sowing ant *149equal acreage that year, and of harvesting it the next. At the expiration of the first year, the parties settled satisfactorily; and it was then verbally agreed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henshaw v. BissellSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Garney v. MosherMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sheffield Car Co. v. Constantine Hydraulic Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Christenson v. OhrmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  3. Township of Portsmouth v. Cranage Steamship Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Binder v. WlaskolinMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API