Legal Opinion

Garney v. Mosher

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error- to Hillsdale. (Lane, J.) Trover. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff brought trover for wheat grown upon land owned by, defendant Orrin B. Mosher. The wheat was sown by Alvah L. Mosher while occupying the land as the tenant'of Orrin B. The wheat was harvested by defendant Mosher, and sold to defendant Henry S. Walworth, who, it is claimed, had notice of plaintiff's, *555rights. Prior to the spring of 1890, Alvah L. Mosher had occupied the land under a written lease, and in the spring of that year renewed his lease for one year by oral agreement. The testimony of plaintiff shows that on the occasion of the verbal letting Alvah refused to pay the rent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Huyser v. ChaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Dayton v. VandoozerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Nye v. PattersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Francis Bros. v. SchallbergerOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Hand v. OsgoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Smith v. SpragueMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. National City Bank of New York v. GarzotCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
  5. Stoner v. MarkeyOhio Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API