Legal Opinion

Haefele v. Brackett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1917No. 13822PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Alston, J., entered June 10, 1916, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Chadwick, J. —

Plaintiff was employed by defendant to work a small farm near Edmonds. He alleges that defendant agreed to pay him forty dollars a month and board. Defendant denies that he agreed to pay forty dollars except for a limited time. He alleges that he has paid plaintiff all that is due; that payments were made from time to time and *626accepted without protest, which is, in itself, sufficient evidence to sustain defendant’s version of the contract.

Plaintiff claims wages for 54 months at forty dol-

lars, or..................................$2,160

Board at $8.00 per…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gage v. GageWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Frost v. Ainslie Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Pettet v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Tilden v. Gordon & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Hart v. DeniseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scribner v. National Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Knecht v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Nevins v. ScaceWashington Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API