Legal Opinion

Gage v. Gage

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1914No. 11315PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Hinkle, J., entered November 21, 1912, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for services rendered.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff seeks recovery of compensation from the defendant for services which she claimed she rendered to him as housekeeper. Verdict and judgment were rendered in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendant has appealed.

It is first contended that the evidence does not sustain the verdict and judgment, in that it does not warrant the conclusion that respondent, being a married woman, has the right to separately sue for the compensation she seeks, as her separate property. The facts, which a review of the evidence convinces us the jury was warranted in regarding as proven thereby,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dobbins v. Dexter Horton & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Yake v. PughWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Frost v. Ainslie Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Binge's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Volz v. ZangWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Staley v. Estate of HarberArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. In re the Marriage of DewBerryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. State Ex Rel. Van Moss v. SailorsWashington Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API